Re: Simulink for Octave

[c.]

On 16 Aug 2011, at 13:04, Sergei Steshenko wrote:

> If I'm not mistaken, http://www.scilab.org/products/xcos is an approximate
> equivalent of 'simulink'.
> 
> So, maybe it has to be _ported_ to Octave - rather than developed from
> scratch.
> 
> Regards,
>  Sergei.
> 
> P.S. IMO 'scilab' has more features (I mean, with tools other than core
> 'scilab'), but inferior interpreter. It's a pity there is no FOSS project
> combining the best of the two worlds.
> 
> 'scilab' license is now compatible with GPL.

I wouldn't say the scilab interpreter is "inferior", but rather that it is less 
compatible with Matlab syntax as compared to Octave.
c.