[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simulink for Octave
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: Simulink for Octave |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Aug 2011 04:04:21 -0700 (PDT) |
--- On Tue, 8/16/11, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: c. <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Simulink for Octave
> To: "xavion" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2011, 2:36 AM
>
> On 16 Aug 2011, at 08:54, xavion wrote:
>
> > Any plans for a Simulink-like capability? I
> think this would be hugely
> > beneficial to the simulation community and entice more
> users to the Octave
> > user base. It would save people like myself
> thousands of dollars in
> > Matlab/Simulink licenses.
>
> Would you be willing to invest part of those K$ to fund
> development of a
> simulink-like module for Octave?
>
> c.
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
>
If I'm not mistaken, http://www.scilab.org/products/xcos is an approximate
equivalent of 'simulink'.
So, maybe it has to be _ported_ to Octave - rather than developed from
scratch.
Regards,
Sergei.
P.S. IMO 'scilab' has more features (I mean, with tools other than core
'scilab'), but inferior interpreter. It's a pity there is no FOSS project
combining the best of the two worlds.
'scilab' license is now compatible with GPL.
- Simulink for Octave, xavion, 2011/08/16
- Re: Simulink for Octave, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/16
- Re: Simulink for Octave, c., 2011/08/16
- Re: Simulink for Octave,
Sergei Steshenko <=
- Re: Simulink for Octave, xavion, 2011/08/19
- Re: Simulink for Octave, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/19
- Re: Simulink for Octave, c., 2011/08/19
- Re: Simulink for Octave, xavion, 2011/08/19
- Re: Simulink for Octave, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/08/19
- Re: Simulink for Octave, Sven-Erik Tiberg, 2011/08/20
- Re: Simulink for Octave, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/20
- Re: Simulink for Octave, c., 2011/08/20