[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: version of SuiteSparse?
From: |
Thomas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: version of SuiteSparse? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:07:30 +0200 |
Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2007, 21:13 -0400 schrieb Ben Abbott:
> On Oct 16, 2007, at 5:12 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
>
> To be clear, while I'm not up to speed on the details of concerning
> GPL projects linking to non-GPL libraries, I was surprised that
> SuiteSparse did this. I have no personal problem with leaving Metis
> out, but don't expect the Fink team will like the idea of a partial
> package for SuiteSparse ...
Then they'd better get permission to distribute Metis.
http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/metis/metis/faq?q=metis/metis/faq#distribute
Thomas
- Re: compiling the bleeding-edge on OS X, (continued)
- version of SuiteSparse?, Ben Abbott, 2007/10/16
- version of SuiteSparse?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/16
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, Ben Abbott, 2007/10/16
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2007/10/16
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, David Bateman, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, David Bateman, 2007/10/18
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?,
Thomas Weber <=
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, David Bateman, 2007/10/16