[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: version of SuiteSparse?
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: version of SuiteSparse? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:49:08 -0500 |
On 16/10/2007, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
> To be clear, while I'm not up to speed on the details of concerning
> GPL projects linking to non-GPL libraries, I was surprised that
> SuiteSparse did this. I have no personal problem with leaving Metis
> out, but don't expect the Fink team will like the idea of a partial
> package for SuiteSparse ...
This isn't a matter of liking ideas or not... unless you like
lawsuits. GPL enforcement lawsuits *have* happened, with a recent one
in the US getting some publicity:
http://newsfeedresearcher.com/data/articles_t38/idt2007.09.21.01.13.21.html
Keep the code free. We GPL advocates don't like it when this doesn't happen. :-)
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: compiling the bleeding-edge on OS X, (continued)
- Re: compiling the bleeding-edge on OS X, John Swensen, 2007/10/11
- Re: compiling the bleeding-edge on OS X, Ben Abbott, 2007/10/14
- version of SuiteSparse?, Ben Abbott, 2007/10/16
- version of SuiteSparse?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/16
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, Ben Abbott, 2007/10/16
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, David Bateman, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, David Bateman, 2007/10/18
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, Thomas Weber, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, David Bateman, 2007/10/16