[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## Re: Another newbie question

**From**: |
nwerneck |

**Subject**: |
Re: Another newbie question |

**Date**: |
Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:07:05 -0300 |

**User-agent**: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |

Double precision yields about log10(2**(64-1-11)) decimal places of precision,
and single precision attains log10(2**(32-1-8)).
That's enough in most cases. The biggest precision I ever had to use was
to implement digital IIR filters, and I had to use 5 or 6 decimal places...
If you want to memorize PI, it's 3,14159265358979323846264338327950288
as far as I can remember... :)
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:12:54PM -0600, Fausto Arinos Barbuto wrote:
>* *
>* Dear All:*
>* *
>* Even though output_precision = 48 unveils lots of digits for,*
>* say, pi or sqrt(2.0), I found out that only the first 15 are exact*
>* -- the rest seems to be rubbish. I wonder if I am not mistaken, and*
>* if there is no way to show more digits. After all, Windows ME's*
>* Calculator shows pi with 32 correct digits. And should 32-digit*
>* precision is *not* possible, why does Octave show so many useless*
>* digits?*
--
Nicolau Werneck <address@hidden> 9F99 25AB E47E 8724 2F71
http://cefala.org/~nwerneck EA40 DC23 42CE 6B76 B07F
"The great tragedy of science -- the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an
ugly fact. "
-- Thomas Huxley
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------