[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The future of Octave
From: |
Manuel A. Camacho Q. |
Subject: |
Re: The future of Octave |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Dec 2000 09:48:30 -0600 |
Hi!
I am not a programmer, nor scientist. I am an Electromechanical Engineer
who is trying to use Octave as an everyday tool.
Thinking why do ppl want MathLab compatibility, well, I guess it is due
to the quantity and quality of the documentation available for MathLab,
and the few (if almost none) available for Octave.
> has everything in it I want --- just need to convert my *.m code base.
Yep. I think that's the point. Instead of making Octave "ML compatible",
we can better think of a file translator, made with an scripting tool to
convert .m files to Octave files.
I am finishing my grad work, and although I have been in the list for a
while, I am able to help some other guys to make a compliment "How to"
guide for Octave.
John, thanks a lot for all you have done.
-Manuel.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- The future of Octave, John W. Eaton, 2000/12/07
- Re: The future of Octave, David Doolin, 2000/12/07
- Re: The future of Octave, flatmax, 2000/12/07
- Re: The future of Octave, Andy Adler, 2000/12/07
- Re: The future of Octave, Dirk Eddelbuettel, 2000/12/07
- Re: The future of Octave,
Manuel A. Camacho Q. <=
- Re: The future of Octave, John W. Eaton, 2000/12/09
- Re: The future of Octave, Paul Kienzle, 2000/12/09
- Re: The future of Octave, Lynn Winebarger, 2000/12/10
- Re: The future of Octave, Keisuke Nishida, 2000/12/10
Re: The future of Octave, David Doolin, 2000/12/07
Re: The future of Octave, John W. Eaton, 2000/12/08