[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
operation x=x(:)
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
operation x=x(:) |
Date: |
Wed, 5 May 1999 15:19:06 -0500 (CDT) |
On 5-May-1999, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
| I am testing the ability of octave to replace MatLab in my
| company.
If you do decide to use Octave instead of (or in addition to) Matlab
at your company, please consider funding the future development of
Octave.
| One of the biggest drawbacks to use it is the missing
| ´x=x(:)´ operation.
I'm not sure why you say that it is missing. Octave has understood
colon indexing for a long time. In versions 2.0.12 and later, I
believe that it works in a Matlab-compatible way no matter what the
value of do_fortran_indexing. For earlier versions, you had to set
do_fortran_indexing to 1 (or, for really ancient versions, "yes") to
enable compatible behavior.
GNU Octave, version 2.0.14 (i686-pc-linux-gnu).
Copyright (C) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 John W. Eaton.
This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
For details, type `warranty'.
octave:1> x = rand (2)
x =
0.14962 0.13838
0.98633 0.30464
octave:2> x = x(:)
x =
0.14962
0.98633
0.13838
0.30464
| Another topic - if anyone of the maintainers is listening: Taken the
| case I think octave is able to replace MatLab I would like to port a
| good part of MatLab´s signal toolbox with the help of an
| internship. I would be very happy if one of the ocatve team could
| tell me how this can be done without violating the legal rights of
| MathWorks. Of course we would follow the little pledge from
| octave´s signal toolbox help and share the results ;)
If you want an interpretation of the Matlab copyright and license, I
think it would make more sense to ask someone at the MathWorks for an
official statement on the issue.
jwe
- operation x=x(:), oliver . eichler, 1999/05/05
- operation x=x(:),
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: operation x=x(:), Wonkoo Kim, 1999/05/05
- Re: operation x=x(:), John W. Eaton, 1999/05/05
- Re: operation x=x(:), Mike Miller, 1999/05/05
- Re: operation x=x(:), John Logsdon, 1999/05/06
- Re: operation x=x(:), Ted Harding, 1999/05/06
- Re: operation x=x(:), John W. Eaton, 1999/05/06