[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem with source() ?
From: |
Daniel Friedman |
Subject: |
Re: Problem with source() ? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:58:39 -0500 (EST) |
On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, John W. Eaton wrote [in part]:
> Then I think the answer is to use source().
and
> If file is called "foo.m", you have to say that. Just
> using "foo" won't work, because source() doesn't append ".m".
Now I get it: my whole problem was the missing .m; I was using
source("foo") instead of source("foo.m"). All is clear now!
Thank you!
--dan
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Friedman address@hidden http://www.isr.umd.edu/~danielf