help-grub
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cpanel boycott


From: Thomas Joseph
Subject: Re: Cpanel boycott
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 13:39:03 -0800 (PST)


--- On Sun, 12/25/11, Chris Murphy <address@hidden> wrote:

> From: Chris Murphy <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Cpanel boycott
> To: "Thomas Joseph" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Sunday, December 25, 2011, 2:39 AM
> On Dec 24, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Thomas
> Joseph wrote:
> 
> > Agreed,
> > 
> > You are 20+ into grub devel.
> > 
> > It should not double-cross you if another member post
> a comment that is
> > closely related to IT.
> > 
> > Why you are so intolerant ad post like a fanatic?
> > 
> > Is grub that you invented ? your f***** ? no ?
> > 
> > Then why are you so adamant ?
> > 
> > What is is your problem if some guy wants to share his
> experience ?
> > 
> > Isn't that driving OSS ? the the open source move ?
> > 
> > Your attitude and stand is more towards the closed
> source offerings.
> > 
> > Do you have a hidden agenda that you in-filtrate into
> an open source
> > mailing list and carry that inside your wings ?
> > 
> > Even Torvalds would not repudiate, if a memberĀ 
> wants to share his
> > concerns about nvidia in lkml
> > 
> > With 20 yrs exp, you need to grow up further.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> 
> 
> Cpanel and GRUB are completely unrelated. Web browsers and
> GRUB are completely unrelated. This is not a general purpose
> IT list. Nvidia and linux are very much related at a kernel
> level and seems quite appropriate on lkml. Your analogy is
> fatally flawed.
> 
> Even nvidia is on-topic for help-grub because GRUB2 does
> have video drivers and settings.
> 
> Clutter on a list causes seekers and givers of help on the
> subject matter to leave. This is a very vertical list, and
> it would not surprise me if it gets so little on-topic
> activity, because long ago people figured out they don't get
> meaningful help on grub, but instead receive clutter in
> their inboxes. The useful purpose of the list is diluted by
> such grossly off topic emails. 
> 
> RFC 1855 3.1.1 also includes the admonition to not wander
> off-topic on mailing lists. It also says to take
> disagreements off list. I tried to keep this off list. But
> then you and the other troll bring off-line emails back into
> the list without permission, which is incompatible with
> netiquette, copyright law and RFC 1855 2.1.1. The notices
> expressly telling people that personal emails aren't to be
> redistributed are for those who don't understand copyright.
> By default copyright is attached immediately to the author's
> email (the person writing it or their employer in some
> cases).
> 
> 
> Chris


Chris and the list,

Assume, we are in Vatican, attending the Holy Mass with HH Pope.
It is a great time, it is Xmas eve and we are in true perception of
the RFC wrt religion, what ever.

Can't it occur to someone cry Tsunami, if he has feed from reliable sources? Is 
he only supposed to utter "Father who art in heaven" and
"I believe" or "Hail Mary.."?

The one may want to save lives though he is in violation of the
protocol just like the one who anointed the very first pope, 
long back.

Do you still see a problem ?

That is the case here.

Thanks,





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]