Re: [help-GIFT] Re: Patches AMD 64 next try...

[Wolfgang Müller]

On Monday 26 February 2007 16:07, address@hidden wrote:
> You and I are getting different results. You're using whats in CVS, and
> the one line change i mentioned in the last mail, right?
>
> i used to run into something that sounds like your bug, but i dont remember
> the details, its been months since i messed with it.
>

I applied the patches you sent to this list relevant to FeatureExtraction (the 
other ones, too), and I found that most of them were already applied in CVS. 
So I had the impression of being pretty up-to-date :-) .

I will post my current gabor.c to this list to make sure that we speak about 
the same thing. It's at home behind a NAT so tomorrow earliest.

> personally, i break things, then valgrind them to death. i'll let you know
> when i have progress with this.

The fact that you said that the output of your stuff was bit-compatible to 
David's suggests that David's version had the same bug (yielding some 
calculation glitches), but that the optimisations make it become apparent as 
segfault on 64 bit.

Cheers,
Wolfgang

-- 
Dr. Wolfgang Müller
LS Medieninformatik
Universität Bamberg
Check out the SIG MM web site http://www.sigmm.org