Re: [help-GIFT] Re: Patches AMD 64 next try...

[risc]

On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:20:10AM +0100, Wolfgang Mueller wrote:
> 
> Wolfgang:
> > 
> > i'm still reviewing the last patch to make it work on my machine..
> > 
> > basically, if in gabor.c, if you change either the x or the y variable from 
> > a uint32_t to a uint64_t, it starts magically working.
> > 
> > no, i've no idea. i'm still fighting this one. but after that, it magically 
> > starts working, on my machine.
> I am a fan of printouts. And my printouts tell me that some index is
> getting negative, and the reason why makes sense. So my hunch is, that
> if it works magically is that some overflow plays into our hands. But
> this does not make the multiplication result correct.
> 
> Cheers,
> Wolfgang
> --
> Dr. Wolfgang Mueller
> LS Medieninformatik
> Universitaet Bamberg


You and I are getting different results. You're using whats in CVS, and 
the one line change i mentioned in the last mail, right? 

i used to run into something that sounds like your bug, but i dont remember the 
details, its been months since i messed with it.

personally, i break things, then valgrind them to death. i'll let you know when 
i have progress with this.

Julia Longtin <address@hidden>