Re: [help-GIFT] Re: Patches AMD 64 next try...

[risc]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:22:45AM -0600, address@hidden wrote:
> No problem here. i'd have commited already, if i could find that slowdown on 
> 32bit...
> one of my other projects(openmosix) needs work, and i'm now working two jobs, 
> so time is a little rarer than it used to be. :)
> 
> Julia Longtin <address@hidden>
> 
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:52:08AM +0100, Wolfgang Müller wrote:
> > Hi Julia, David,
> > 
> > I hope the year has started nicely for you.
> > 
> > I hope to have a little timeslot this weekend to use and test your patches 
> > and 
> > to get things started again. I guess David will be busy, as teaching etc. 
> > is 
> > starting again for him, so I have the impression that it's just us two 
> > (mainly you) who will work on features & inverted files for amd 64 in the 
> > near future. So, in order to keep going and to make things easier for you, 
> > I 
> > would suggest thtat you check things into CVS when they work for you and 
> > check if we complain that they do not work, rather than have us apply the 
> > patches, check, and then apply them to CVS. Is this OK with you, too, David?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Wolfgang
> > -- 
> > Dr. Wolfgang Müller
> > LS Medieninformatik
> > Universität Bamberg
> > Check out the SIG MM web site http://www.sigmm.org
> 
> 


A month later, and i've finally got 5 minutes to dedicate. ;)

I Applied the following patch, to force bootstrap-cvs.sh to fail in case of 
auto* errors, and to no longer use --force on the aclocal invocation.

this patch is REQUIRED to compile on my debian unstable machines. i'd be 
interested in hearing stories of it breaking things.

Julia Longtin <address@hidden>

00-ChangeLog
Description: Text document

00-bootstrap_cvs_sh-remove_force_and_error_out.patch
Description: Text document