[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex

[Tuomas J. Lukka]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        03/03/31 09:25:57

Modified files:
        Paper          : paper.tex 

Log message:
        reorg

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex.diff?tr1=1.92&tr2=1.93&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex
diff -u manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.92 manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.93
--- manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.92    Mon Mar 31 09:10:42 2003
+++ manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex Mon Mar 31 09:25:57 2003
@@ -1101,19 +1101,6 @@
 %the output values can be scaled up only once per each general 
 %combiner stage by at most 4. 
 
-\begin{figure*}
-\centering
-\ifpics
-\includegraphics[height=10cm]{multipaper.ps}
-\fi
-\caption{
-\label{fig-examples}
-A number of unique backgrounds generated by our system.
-This view can be rendered, without pre-rendering the textures,
-in 20 ms on a GeForce4 Ti 4200 in a 1024x768 window (fill-rate/bandwidth 
limited).
-}
-\end{figure*}
-
 \begin{figure}
 \centering
 \ifpics
@@ -1184,12 +1171,39 @@
 \end{figure*}
 
 \section{Experiences, evaluation}
-In the following, we evaluate the implications and tradeoffs 
-of different
-aspects in the use of unique backround textures.  
+
+%In the following, we evaluate the implications and tradeoffs 
+%of different
+%aspects in the use of unique backround textures.  
 
 \subsection{Overall appearance of the resulting textures}
 
+As seen in Fig.~\ref{fig-examples}, the overall appearance of the textures
+is somewhat natural and the textures clearly do have unique distinguishing
+features.
+
+\begin{figure*}
+\centering
+\ifpics
+\includegraphics[height=10cm]{multipaper.ps}
+\fi
+\caption{
+\label{fig-examples}
+A number of unique backgrounds generated by our system.
+This view can be rendered, without pre-rendering the textures,
+in 20 ms on a GeForce4 Ti 4200 in a 1024x768 window (fill-rate/bandwidth 
limited).
+}
+\end{figure*}
+
+The can be zoomed quite well, 
+even though
+we have not tried to attain infinite zoomability\cite{furnas00infinity}
+with the current implementation,
+but only the more modest goal of zooming within a range 
+that would be reasonable for a single PDF document, 
+i.e., approximately 20-fold
+difference between mininum and maximum zoom. 
+
 %The background textures should be be recognizable at different scales.
 Although texture perception is scale-independent to some extent,
 the display resolution and certain spatial interactions 
@@ -1201,12 +1215,6 @@
 so that the resulting textures have separate
 distinguishing features on both small and large scales.
 
-We have not tried to attain infinite zoomability\cite{furnas00infinity}
-with the current implementation,
-but only the more modest goal of zooming within a range 
-that would be reasonable for a single PDF document, 
-i.e., approximately 10-fold
-difference between mininum and maximum zoom. 
 % This is in line with our
 % intended use, since it would be unreasonable 
 % to expect a texture to be recognizable
@@ -1215,6 +1223,7 @@
 to make the unique background look similar 
 at different scales, but
 this would remove the use of the texture as a cue of scale.
+
 Our
 nonlinear use of the register combiners
 does have some ill effects when zooming the texture out