|
From: | MSavoritias |
Subject: | Re: Concerns/questions around Software Heritage Archive |
Date: | Sun, 17 Mar 2024 13:57:07 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 |
On 3/17/24 13:53, paul wrote:
Hi all ,thank you MSavoritias for bringing up points that many of us share. It's clearly a tradeoff what to do about the past. For the future, as Christpher already stated, we need a serious solution that we can uphold as a free software project that does not alienate users or contributors.My opinion is that names are just wrong to be included, not only because of deadnames, but in general having a database with a column first_name and a column second_name is something only a 35 yrs old white cis boy could have thought was a good idea to model the spectrum of names humans use all over the world:https://web.archive.org/web/20240317114846/https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/If we'd really need to identify contributors, and obviously Guix doesn't, we could use an UUID/machine readable identifier which can then be mapped to a displayed name. I believe git can already be configured to do so.giacomo
The uuid sounds like a very interesting solution indeed. I wonder how easy it could be to add it to git.I agree that making some rules about names that are going to be wrong at some point or in some place is the wrong solution long term for sure.
MSavoritias
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |