[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hardened toolchain
From: |
raingloom |
Subject: |
Re: Hardened toolchain |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Apr 2022 05:51:40 +0200 |
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 15:36:25 -0500
Nathan Dehnel <ncdehnel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >People shouldn't have to take extra steps and burn extra CPU cycles
> >for
> security. If I have to recompile everything to harden my system, I
> likely won't bother.
> >Pretty much everyone benefits from hardening, but not everyone has
> >the
> resources and know how to do it manually. Just choosing what to harden
> is already not a trivial question.
>
> Then have hardened be the default and have --hardened=off be the
> package transform option?
Yes, that seems like a better solution. Maybe call it
--without-hardening, to match the current convention.
(Like --with-latest, --without-tests, etc)
- Re: Hardened toolchain, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Hardened toolchain, jbranso, 2022/04/15
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Zhu Zihao, 2022/04/15
- Re: Hardened toolchain, raingloom, 2022/04/15
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2022/04/26
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Aurora, 2022/04/28
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2022/04/28
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Aurora, 2022/04/28
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Vagrant Cascadian, 2022/04/28
- Re: Hardened toolchain, Aurora, 2022/04/28
Re: Hardened toolchain, Nathan Dehnel, 2022/04/15
- Re: Hardened toolchain,
raingloom <=
Re: Hardened toolchain, zimoun, 2022/04/29