[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What’s next?
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
Re: What’s next? |
Date: |
Sat, 15 May 2021 23:24:41 +0300 |
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 07:47:19PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> So, now that 1.3.0 is out the door, what’s next?!
>
> Here’s my wish list of things that look achievable within 4 to 6 months
> (I hope to help on some of these):
>
> • Merging Guix Home.
>
> • Completing and consolidating Disarchive support (see
> <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47336>): continuously building the
> Disarchive database, making sure it’s replicated or backed up by
> SWH, and having a blog post or two explaining the whole endeavor
> (I’m looking at you, Timothy ;-)).
>
> • Merging Magali’s ‘guix git log’ work.
>
> • Merging ‘core-updates’, perhaps with a switch to GCC 10? Perhaps
> with support for “simplified packages” (getting rid of input
> labels)? We’ll see how much can go in there, but the sooner the
> better.
>
> • On ‘core-updates’, merging either the full-source bootstrap or
> the reduced bootstrap on ARM, whichever comes first. :-)
>
> • Consolidating the POWER9 and AArch64 ports (more build machines
> behind ci.guix!).
>
> • Maybe a step towards “early cutoffs” to reduce the amount of
> rebuilding (more on that in a future post).
>
> • Maybe optimized substitute downloads based on
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2021-01/msg00080.html>
> or at the store item level (same as for early cutoffs).
>
> • Maybe parameterized packages based on
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-11/msg00312.html>.
>
> What do people think? What’s your wish list? What do you feel an urge
> to hack on? :-)
>
> Ludo’.
>
+1 on core-updates
package-transformations applied to the operating-system field of the
os-config.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: What’s next?, Maxime Devos, 2021/05/16