Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix

[Pierre Neidhardt]

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

>> Sadly it's the part that exposes one of the most obvious issues:
>> guix-devel-build-package-definition ("C-c . b") chokes Geiser and hangs
>> Emacs.
>
> First, please Pierre, could you stop to refer to
> `guix-devel-build-package-definition' when the correct one is
> `guix-build-package'; which needs some updates, I agree.  Patch should
> come…

Misunderstanding?  guix-devel-build-package-definition is an actual
command, why do you think this is incorrect?   Are you talking about
something else?

Maybe I'm reading you wrong, but your last paragraph reads a bit brash.
Let's keep this a friendly conversation! :)

> Second, the issues with building packages using Emacs-Guix are about
> implementation details i.e., fix the use of the API.  I am still missing
> why Geiser chokes when “guix repl” in ’M-x shell’ do not since they are
> both inherited from `comint-mode'.

It's partly explored here: https://gitlab.com/emacs-geiser/geiser/-/issues/9

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature