Re: qtwenengine anybody?

[Hartmut Goebel]

Hi,

I'm glad to see there already has been some effort on this. I'll comment
on the issue.

Am 16.12.19 um 15:13 schrieb address@hidden:
> This new monolithic package stills suffers from the same issue as my
> modular qtwebengine. In that there are many in tree third party
> dependencies. It's not trivial to simply switch to guix inputs for
> these.

IMO we should focus on a stand-alone qtwebengine package to avoid having
packages depending on a *huge* monolith.


-- 
Regards
Hartmut Goebel

| Hartmut Goebel          | address@hidden               |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |