[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: frames / stacks / source? was Re: coverage/profiling
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: frames / stacks / source? was Re: coverage/profiling |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:12:01 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:
> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> (define coverage-trap (make <entry-trap> #:behaviour cover-entry))
>
> You don't have to use goops to get a trap do you?
In terms of the low-level call outs from the evaluator, no. In terms
of the infrastructure that (ice-9 debugging traps) builds on top of
that, yes.
Regards,
Neil
- Re: frames / stacks / source? was Re: coverage/profiling, (continued)
- Re: frames / stacks / source? was Re: coverage/profiling, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/10
- Re: frames / stacks / source? was Re: coverage/profiling, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/01/11
- Re: frames / stacks / source? was Re: coverage/profiling, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/11
- Re: frames / stacks / source? was Re: coverage/profiling, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/01/11
- Re: frames / stacks / source? was Re: coverage/profiling, Neil Jerram, 2007/01/13
- Re: frames / stacks / source? was Re: coverage/profiling, Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/18
- Re: frames / stacks / source? was Re: coverage/profiling,
Neil Jerram <=