Re: Serious bug in GUILE rational handling.

[Carl Witty]

On Sun, 2006-12-24 at 10:21 +1100, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> I don't know if reduced or unreduced is a better representation.  My
> guess would be that gcds are so horrendously expensive that unreduced
> is often what you want, if it's do-able.  Reducing lazily sounds like
> the best of both worlds, but as you point out would need multithread
> protection.

This was discussed three years ago (my contribution to the discussion
was
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2003-12/msg00013.html).

Carl Witty