Re: memoization and conditional defines

[Clinton Ebadi]

> I don't care how memoization works.  I understand there are
> optimization issues.  Optimizing isn't important to me, or
> I would not use an interpretive language as my "extension
> language".  If you add a disabling mechanism, then you'll
> have the best of all worlds.  You can memoize/optimize to
> your heart's content, and I'll disable it for my purposes.
> If that is not practical and Guile becomes, essentially,
> an semi-compiled language with constraints on where
> defines may happen, then my goose will be cooked.

Not to mention how Guile wouldn't be Scheme anymore. Why can't code be 
memiozied and compiled incrementally?

-- 
http://unknownlamer.org
Truth lies in loneliness
When hope is long gone by