[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition? |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:54:55 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 |
Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:
> cool thanks, i have started to look at this. although i think there
> might be some policy issues (what to include in the API), i'm sure the
> macrology seems sound. one style issue i'd like to bring up early: the
> cpp macro __SCM_IMPORT__ and friends should probably be replaced w/
> something like HAVE_SCM_API, HAVE_SCM_REGEX_API, since there is
> machinery for this style already.
Right, and also because (correct me if I'm wrong), C reserves any
symbols starting with an underscore...
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, stefan, 2001/10/25
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, stefan, 2001/10/25
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/25
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, stefan, 2001/10/28
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/31
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, stefan, 2001/10/31
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, stefan, 2001/10/31
- Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?, stefan, 2001/10/31