Re: Does guile have serious win32 ambition?

[stefan]

On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:

> cool thanks, i have started to look at this.  although i think there
> might be some policy issues (what to include in the API), i'm sure the
> macrology seems sound.  one style issue i'd like to bring up early: the
> cpp macro __SCM_IMPORT__ and friends should probably be replaced w/
> something like HAVE_SCM_API, HAVE_SCM_REGEX_API, since there is
> machinery for this style already.
> 
> in any case, i'll look for or add in a top-level config cpp macro that
> defaults to !HAVE_SCM_API (that is, unless you beat me to it).

What do you exactly mean?  I do not understand the question.  Do you just
want to replace __SCM_IMPORT__ with HAVE_SCM_API?  This seems to be a bad
idea since you need a "triple condition": __SCM_IMPORT__,
__SCM_EXPORT__, neither nor.

Cheers,
        address@hidden