[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated |
Date: |
16 Sep 2001 21:14:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.102 |
stefan <address@hidden> writes:
> On 6 Sep 2001, Marius Vollmer wrote:
>
> > > The exact problem is about "long long" is MSVC's causing a parse error. It
> > > does not know it. But it knows "__int64" which is the current equivalent
> > > to gcc's "long long".
> >
> > Hmm, why does it encounter long long at all? All occurrences should be
> > guarded by HAVE_LONG_LONG, and this should not be defined on your
> > platform.
>
> I defined it in my config.cache by hand, because I knew that there is a
> "long long" replacement (which is __int64). Thus I have a HAVE_LONG_LONG
> in my <config.h>.
They you deserve to lose. "HAVE_LONG_LONG" does not mean "There is a
64 bit type on this system, with an unknown name". It means "There is
a `long long' type on this system."
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, (continued)
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, Rob Browning, 2001/09/06
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, stefan, 2001/09/07
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, Rob Browning, 2001/09/07
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, stefan, 2001/09/07
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, Rob Browning, 2001/09/07
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, stefan, 2001/09/08
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/09/15
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, Marius Vollmer, 2001/09/16
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, Rob Browning, 2001/09/17
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, stefan, 2001/09/17
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated,
Marius Vollmer <=