Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated

[stefan]

On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Rob Browning wrote:

> stefan <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > This is why I want you to ask to reintroduce a likewise typedef or
> > "reverse-deprecate" the typdefs "long_long" and "ulong_long". I could
> > verify the changes with the MSVC. I sent previous patches to Martin
> > Grabmueller and Marius Vollmer containing the changes for long_long and
> > ulong_long.
> 
> If we're going to support compilers that don't have the ISO type, then
> it seems like we might need the type names, but we might want to
> change them to match the current naming policy, i.e. something like
> scm_t_longlong and scm_t_ulonglong.

I would be pleased with these two types, any comments, headaches, etc.
except R.Browning and me ?

Cheers,
        address@hidden