Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated

[Rob Browning]

stefan <address@hidden> writes:

> This is why I want you to ask to reintroduce a likewise typedef or
> "reverse-deprecate" the typdefs "long_long" and "ulong_long". I could
> verify the changes with the MSVC. I sent previous patches to Martin
> Grabmueller and Marius Vollmer containing the changes for long_long and
> ulong_long.

If we're going to support compilers that don't have the ISO type, then
it seems like we might need the type names, but we might want to
change them to match the current naming policy, i.e. something like
scm_t_longlong and scm_t_ulonglong.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD