[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?
From: |
Martin Grabmueller |
Subject: |
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 18:49:31 +0200 |
> From: Nicolas Neuss <address@hidden>
> Date: 25 Apr 2001 18:15:02 +0200
>
> Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Martin Grabmueller <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > guile> (gensym "foo")
> > > foo1
> > > guile> (gensym "foo")
> > > foo2
> > > guile> (define foo3 1)
> > > guile> foo3
> > > 1
> > > guile> (gensym "foo")
> > > foo3
[...]
> I guess, no. The decisive point with gensyms is that they are not eq?
> to any ordinary symbol. That means that the name does not matter, but
> only memory address. Did you tes if they are eq?.
address@hidden (~/cvs/guile/x/guile-1.4.1): guile
guile> (eq? 'foo0 (gensym "foo"))
#t
Regards,
'martin
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, (continued)
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Michael Livshin, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Dale P. Smith, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Michael Livshin, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Nicolas Neuss, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?,
Martin Grabmueller <=
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Nicolas Neuss, 2001/04/26
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/25