[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"? |
Date: |
26 Apr 2001 01:31:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> Is that possible with gensym or gentmp?
Looks like gensym needs to be fixed. It should create uninterned
symbols.
My short term plan is like this: understand how the current module
system hand together, with itself and with symbols.c. Beat on it
until the-root-module and the-scm-module lose their special status.
Clean up symbols.c so that it has nothing to do with the module
system. In that process, make gensym produce uninterned symbols.
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, (continued)
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Michael Livshin, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Dale P. Smith, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Michael Livshin, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Nicolas Neuss, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Nicolas Neuss, 2001/04/26
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?,
Marius Vollmer <=