[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"? |
Date: |
25 Apr 2001 23:26:30 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> Hmm. Well, I nearly got syntax-rules working as I wanted, but got
> stuck with letrec-syntax. Can you not use it to create internal
> helper-macros?
I believe this is undefined, and for good reason: you don't want to
mix the meta-language (the one you use to build syntax) with the
target language. well, compiler writers really don't want you to.
--
a newbie: Why doesn't Lisp have pass by reference?
Erik Naggum: Because C++ doesn't have multiple return values.
(from a conversation in comp.lang.lisp)
- Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/24
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?,
Michael Livshin <=
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Dale P. Smith, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Michael Livshin, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Nicolas Neuss, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Nicolas Neuss, 2001/04/26
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/25