[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-vm 0.3
From: |
Evan Prodromou |
Subject: |
Re: guile-vm 0.3 |
Date: |
03 Apr 2001 22:23:20 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "RB" == Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
>> Mi biggest fear with lightning is that it is platform specific.
RB> Agreed, but no matter what approach we choose, there's going
RB> to be plenty of work to do. IMO if it turns out that some of
RB> that work needs to be on lightning, then so be it :>
It seems that the 2-step mechanism (compile to GLIL bytecode, then
interpret, JIT-compiling if supported on the platform) would
ameliorate the problem considerably.
~ESP
- --
Evan Prodromou
address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE6yq/HozwefHAKBVERAqmYAKDCWavuEDEnbj2Sn4o6Ml0Z5UFoAACdEQ9w
fThXIlcBRNho9oEyutjPbaY=
=QUgz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Question about your profiling patch..., (continued)
- Re: Question about your profiling patch..., Neil Jerram, 2001/04/07
- Re: Question about your profiling patch..., Rob Browning, 2001/04/07
- Re: Question about your profiling patch..., Rob Browning, 2001/04/05
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/04
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Ariel Rios, 2001/04/03
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/03
- Re: guile-vm 0.3,
Evan Prodromou <=
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Ariel Rios, 2001/04/05
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/05
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/05
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Ariel Rios, 2001/04/05
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/05
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/04/06
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/05