[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pic anomalies
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: pic anomalies |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Dec 2019 23:12:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
Ingo Schwarze <address@hidden>:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric S. Raymond wrote on Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 09:48:16PM -0500:
>
> > Yeah, that was a typo or markup error on my part. I intended %%.
> > Whoever takes on the pic bug is encouraged to fix this in the same
> > commit.
> >
> > I apologize for not being able to take this one myself. I like
> > pic well enough to do it, but right now all my bandwidth is
> > committed to finishing GCC's SVN-to-git repository migration.
>
> Could you all the same have a very brief look at my proposed fix:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2019-12/msg00037.html
>
> A "looks good" or a "nay, not that way" would be quite appreciated.
The groff markup looks correct. I see someone lse is already
doing code review.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: pic anomalies, (continued)
Re: pic anomalies, Federico Lucifredi, 2019/12/27
Re: pic anomalies, Eric S. Raymond, 2019/12/27
- Re: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/27
- Re: pic anomalies,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/29
- Re: pic anomalies, Colin Watson, 2019/12/29
- Re: pic anomalies, Larry McVoy, 2019/12/29
- Re: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/30
- Re: pic anomalies, Colin Watson, 2019/12/30
- GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/30
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/30
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/12/30
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, G. Branden Robinson, 2019/12/31
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/12/31