[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pic anomalies
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: pic anomalies |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Dec 2019 21:48:16 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
Doug McIlroy <address@hidden>:
> The description of sprintf in the man page pic(1) does not
> reveal that only a few format codes are permitted.
>
> Eric Raymond's "Making Pictures With GNU PIC" says only
> %,%e,%f,%g are permitted. But what does a bare % mean?
>
> In fact pic rejects a bare %. However it does accept
> %%, which is supposed to print a single %. Pic,
> however prints %%.
>
> So I believe we have
> 1. An incompleteness in pic(1)
> 2. An error in "Making Pictures With GNU PIC"
> 3. An error in pic itself
>
> Doug
Yeah, that was a typo or markup error on my part. I intended %%.
Whoever takes on the pic bug is encouraged to fix this in the same
commit.
I apologize for not being able to take this one myself. I like
pic well enough to do it, but right now all my bandwidth is
committed to finishing GCC's SVN-to-git repository migration.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- pic anomalies, Doug McIlroy, 2019/12/27
- Re: pic anomalies, Federico Lucifredi, 2019/12/27
- Re: pic anomalies,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/27
- Re: pic anomalies, Eric S. Raymond, 2019/12/27
- Re: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/29
- Re: pic anomalies, Colin Watson, 2019/12/29
- Re: pic anomalies, Larry McVoy, 2019/12/29
- Re: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/30
- Re: pic anomalies, Colin Watson, 2019/12/30
- GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/30
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/30
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/12/30