[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pic anomalies
From: |
Larry McVoy |
Subject: |
Re: pic anomalies |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Dec 2019 15:23:33 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 11:17:26PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> if (*form == '%') {
> form++;
> result += '%';
> }
> else {
> ...
> snprintf(sprintf_buf, sizeof(sprintf_buf),
> one_format.contents(), v[i++]);
> result += sprintf_buf;
> }
> one_format.clear();
I like this better than what I suggested, seems easier to follow. I might
be bike shedding a bit too much but I'd take this one.
On a different topic, is there any sort of test suite for pic and the other
parts of roff?
- Re: pic anomalies, (continued)
- Re: pic anomalies, Federico Lucifredi, 2019/12/27
- Re: pic anomalies, Eric S. Raymond, 2019/12/27
- Re: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/27
- Re: pic anomalies, Eric S. Raymond, 2019/12/27
- Re: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/29
- Re: pic anomalies, Colin Watson, 2019/12/29
- Re: pic anomalies,
Larry McVoy <=
- Re: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/30
- Re: pic anomalies, Colin Watson, 2019/12/30
- GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/30
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/30
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/12/30
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, G. Branden Robinson, 2019/12/31
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/12/31
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/31
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, Colin Watson, 2019/12/30
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, G. Branden Robinson, 2019/12/31