[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?
|
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
|
Subject: |
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:19:01 +0100 |
Hi John,
> I'm not sure whether to stay quiet or point out that you may have
> misread me...
No, I understood. I was pointing out something I do instead of normal
fmt(1) formatting too.
> Roff commands. By contrast, `man` is minimalist and leaves formatting to
s/\./& / :-)
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ingo Schwarze, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, John Gardner, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, John Gardner, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, G. Branden Robinson, 2018/04/21
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/16
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Larry Kollar, 2018/04/18