groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?


From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:43:19 +0100

Hi Ingo,

> Debian, Ubuntu, Arch, Gentoo, Slackware, Homebrew, MacPorts, and
> pkgsrc provide packages that you can install.

Arch Linux's user repository, AUR, has
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mandoc/ but it seems the maintainer
has decided to have it conflict with groff: `...this package now
outright conflicts with groff.  mandoc provides the functionality of
both groff and man-db combined; as such, I consider it a full
replacement'.  I've added a comment pointing out that groff might remain
useful.  :-)

>     https://www.bsdcan.org/2018/schedule/events/958.en.html

That says

     Both Debian and Arch Linux now also use the mandoc formatter for
     their official online manuals.

but I had trouble finding Arch's.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Man_page#Online_man_pages points to
https://manned.org/

I guess you're referring to https://jlk.fjfi.cvut.cz/arch/manpages/about
that they use for wiki links, e.g.
https://jlk.fjfi.cvut.cz/arch/manpages/man/utf-8.7
Odd that they don't explicitly reference it AFAICS.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]