Re: [Groff] folding preconv into soelim?

[Gaius Mulley]

Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:

> > > I further believe that the `.mso' request should *not* be involved in
> > > encoding conversion issues.
> > 
> > sounds like an excellent idea - my only slight worry is that `.mso'
> > is treated differently to `.so' as it would force `.mso' to be only
> > used to include macros rather than text. Just wondering what happens
> > if text needs to be encoded within something.tmac ?
> 
> Remember that .mso isn't handled by soelim at all.  On the other
> hand,

Hi Werner,

ahh yes I had forgotten this, thus my reservation is now redundant..

> there shouldn't be a great problem to convert a file to be included
> with a call to .mso in advance.

true,

Gaius