Re: [Groff] folding preconv into soelim?

[Werner LEMBERG]

> > I further believe that the `.mso' request should *not* be involved in
> > encoding conversion issues.
> 
> sounds like an excellent idea - my only slight worry is that `.mso'
> is treated differently to `.so' as it would force `.mso' to be only
> used to include macros rather than text. Just wondering what happens
> if text needs to be encoded within something.tmac ?

Remember that .mso isn't handled by soelim at all.  On the other hand,
there shouldn't be a great problem to convert a file to be included
with a call to .mso in advance.


    Werner