[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SBC hardware for stratum 0
From: |
Frank Nicholas |
Subject: |
Re: SBC hardware for stratum 0 |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:38:23 -0400 |
U-Blox is a manufacturer of the current most popular (I think) GPS chipsets...
They are are inexpensive, generally available from many sources, but are
some-what proprietary with their specs/protocol (but they do support NEMA
standard, semi, based on the standard/version with proper configuration of the
board/chip). GPSd supports them generally very well, but with their
proprietary nature & ever-changing specs, sometimes it makes it a challenge for
open source projects to keep up or completely interpret/support them in their
proprietary binary config (binary generally being better than NEMA) vs. NEMA,
especially with various version/firmwares.
Others may have additional opinions or information. The is my personal
understanding & observations from following this list & personal research.
Thanks,
Frank
> On Mar 22, 2024, at 7:36 PM, tangoing.mill745@aceecat.org wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 02:32:38PM +0000, David Taylor wrote:
>
>> If you take that approach, may I suggest using a more modern GPS
>> which includes support for more satellites such as Galileo and the
>> Russian and Chinese constellations? There's a Raspberry Pi HAT with
>> a u-blox module just requiring an SMA antenna feed:
> ^^^^^^
>
> I see this mentioned in just about every thread here. Is it some kind
> of pseudostandard for gps devices now?
>
> It's really cozy here under the rock, sorry.
>
> --
> Ian
>
Re: SBC hardware for stratum 0, Niall Parker, 2024/03/22
Re: SBC hardware for stratum 0, Ben Kamen, 2024/03/22
Re: SBC hardware for stratum 0, Gary E. Miller, 2024/03/22
Re: SBC hardware for stratum 0, George Sexton, 2024/03/24