[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNUnet-developers] website and logo rework

From: carlo von lynX
Subject: Re: [GNUnet-developers] website and logo rework
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:31:15 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Martin, we are the minority of people who accepted
the gnu on the web... maybe we want to extend our
audience to the people that think that such a home-
grown logo doesn't stand for professionality? Same
goes for the terrible Taler logo? Let Amirouche'
creativity go wild, it is going in a totally useful

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 06:46:14PM +0100, t3sserakt wrote:
> By the way, is it a stupid idea to let the endpoint of
> a cadet path be not the endpoint of user communication,
> to protect meta data? Maybe this is easier to accomplish
> than onion routing, or an additional protection together
> with OR.

That is actually the simple way to implement OR,
just make CADET connections between the relays
and therefore obfuscate the final endpoints.
The reason we don't do that yet is because we
don't have a strategy to decide which relays are
trustworthy - or maybe, if rps is functional, we
now have one.

  E-mail is public! Talk to me in private using encryption:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]