Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNS domains

[Martin Schanzenbach]

How about GNUnet e.V. doing that as well?
It does seem more reasonable than giving it to a private person.

- Martin

On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 16:45 +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> I think it would be ideal if we didn't just "have" the domains, but
> if
> we had someone running an FCFS (or other policy) registration service
> for GNS there, and possibly a dns2gns bridge, as you envisioned.  So
> if
> we had volunteers that could envision doing so in the future, I'd say
> that's a good reason to retain the domains.  So anyone here who has
> plans of becoming a public service registrar for the GNU Name System?
> 
> On 02/17/2017 08:12 PM, tg (x) wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I got the gnu.name & gnu.zone domains thinking it would be useful
> > for promoting GNS, for instance setting up FCFS registration [1]
> > there
> > and perhaps also a GNS to DNS zone proxy at <fcfs-name>.gnu.name &
> > <zkey>.gnu.zone
> > that may be useful in case one wants to put IP addresses in their
> > zones
> > and want that still reachable from the rest of the DNS world.
> > 
> > I'd transfer these domains to GNUnet e.V. since I already have
> > enough domains
> > and it is also better to keep them registered to the project.
> > 
> > Does GNUnet e.V. want to have these domains?
> > 
> > [1] https://gnunet.org/gns-fcfs-authority-started
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > GNUnet-developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part