gnewsense-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Your Reviews for select Mate Desktop and not Gnome 3


From: Frederique
Subject: Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Your Reviews for select Mate Desktop and not Gnome 3 in the next version
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 00:28:57 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0

What exactly is the good reason behind the desire of wanting to throw out GNOME 3?

GNOME 3 was publicly received badly when it was released, primarily due to the instability, and the whole tablet interface on a desktop operating system fiasco.

I have been reading reviews of GNOME 3, and a lot of desktop users report they experience an increased productivity rate once they figure out all the bits of GNOME 3, leaving the classic task bar start menu behind in a grey memory.

I myself never got into GNOME 3. I never took the time to properly learn it, but it just raises a few questions as to why Debian would stick to GNOME 3, for gNewSense to throw this out. I use gNewSense to have a free Debian, and if gNewSense decides to do major overhauls like this, I would no longer be having a free Debian out of the box.

However, I am looking forward to try GNOME 3 with gNewSense 4 once it is done and thoroughly get to know if before I would really shape an opinion of my own.

I would like for gNewSense to remain as much of a default Debian as possible regarding the out of the box experience, minus the proprietary bits of course. I would not enjoy it either if gNewSense fades away from the stable repository by including recent / edgy software replacements, like resorting to, or adding, a recent MATE version, not offered by the Debian base.

If I wanted edge I would be using Parabola GNU/Linux.

On 26/03/2014 22:19, Sam Geeraerts wrote:
Op Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:42:37 +0100
schreef HacKurx <address@hidden>:

It is very easy to make this, with this base :
http://docs.kali.org/live-build/generate-updated-kali-iso
http://docs.kali.org/live-build/customize-the-kali-desktop-environment
Adding a repo to sources.list will probably get it working, but
gNewSense should be self-hosting and complete [1]. So the steps to
include MATE or any other software are:

- verify if software is free
- verify how committed upstream is to software freedom
- check if it builds with the tools in our release and patch if
   necessary
- check if it integrates with the software in our release and patch if
   necessary
- add/replace branding
- package, build and test
- keep track of (security) updates
- update and translate our documentation if necessary
- support users on IRC and mailing list
- update our Live configuration if appropriate
- generate and test alternate Live images if appropriate

[1] https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
[2] http://wiki.mate-desktop.org/board:manifesto

_______________________________________________
gNewSense-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]