[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling
From: |
Udo Giacomozzi |
Subject: |
Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling |
Date: |
Thu, 3 May 2007 14:44:28 +0200 |
Hello strk,
Thursday, May 3, 2007, 1:53:00 PM, you wrote:
s> 12:11 < Company> flv has timestamps in milliseconds
s> 12:11 < Company> so you'll not get 1000 fps
You don't really think it's encoded with 1000 fps, do you?
s> 12:11 < Company> but you might get new images at 1ms, 2ms and 3000ms
3000ms?
Anyway, shouldn't it be 40ms (25fps) or 67ms (15fps) ?
s> 12:16 < strk> -> // The callback function which unloads the
s> decoded video frames unto the video output
s> imageframe.
s> 12:21 < strk> that function seems to get called 1550 times
s> 12:25 < strk> so there are more frames available (1550) then actually used
(385)
frames available == original frames from the video? You mean 1165
frames are being skipped?
Udo
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, (continued)
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/03
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, strk, 2007/05/03
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/03
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, strk, 2007/05/03
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/03
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, strk, 2007/05/03
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling,
Udo Giacomozzi <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, strk, 2007/05/04
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, strk, 2007/05/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, strk, 2007/05/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, strk, 2007/05/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, strk, 2007/05/04
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, Rob Savoye, 2007/05/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling, strk, 2007/05/06
- Re: [Gnash-dev] youtube profiling (-O2 and inlining), strk, 2007/05/04