[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules
From: |
Andrew Cagney |
Subject: |
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:54:11 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 |
Although it has not happened in a while, Andrew has done exactly that.
This was, in fact, when he first (to my recollection) spelled out his
position that a blanket write maintainer did not really have blanket
write privileges. Here's the thread, which does not include some
rather heated telephone conversations:
Michael,
In choosing to immediatly revert the patch in that thread, rather than
simply pointing out the technical reasons why committing it was
incorrect, I recognized that I made an error of judgment. At the time I
acknowledged this and appologized to you in front of (well on a phone
call with) all of Red Hat's GDB developers.
I've since been very careful to not revert incorrect patches:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-07/msg00547.html
GDB has, since 2000, had global, and not "blanket write" maintainers.
As I explained to david, it was to ensure that everyone, including me
did not have the ability to override someones decision. I corrected the
wording to reflect the reality of this clause:
"Note individuals who maintain parts of the debugger need approval to
check in changes outside of the immediate domain that they maintain.
If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility
falls to a global maintainer.
If there are several maintainers for a given domain then
responsibility falls to the first maintainer. The first maintainer is
free to devolve that responsibility among the other maintainers."
The first paragraph (which was added in 2000) is not consistent with
"blanket write privs".
Also, here's the thread I found proposing the clarification on gdb@:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-10/msg00186.html
and there it sat ...
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-11/msg00075.html
And here I am posting, and then committing, the patch:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-01/msg00674.html
Andrew
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-09/msg00394.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-09/msg00442.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-09/msg00448.html
It was about a month after this that Andrew changed the
MAINTAINERS file to read "global maintainers" instead of
"blanket write maintainers".
_______________________________________________
Gdbheads mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gdbheads
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, (continued)
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Elena Zannoni, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/31
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, David Carlton, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules,
Andrew Cagney <=
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Elena Zannoni, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/31
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, David Carlton, 2004/01/29
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/01/27
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/28