[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] "Contributing to Free Software" article
From: |
Roger Leigh |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] "Contributing to Free Software" article |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:34:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Tom Chance <address@hidden> writes:
> 1.1 - the software isn't *able* to be modified... how about "which allows
> certain freedoms, including..." or "which can be modified..."?
OK.
> In general, it reads well, but I was left feeling that the advice was in
> places a bit random, especially in the coding section. As a document aimed at
> companies using free software, especially companies involved with software
> development, it would work well, since I assume they'd simply approach the
> projects they already rely on and use your tips to guide them in. But as a
> document for individuals, it's too sketchy, especially for non-coders.
The intent was simply to be a list. In most cases, I would expect
potential contributors to get in contact with the relevent projects
and coordinate their efforts from there, so this doesn't aim to go
into great detail: it's just a collection of ways and examples.
> Perhaps you could expand the 2.0 point to explain that there are many things
> a
> user can do to contribute, that they should consider these following tasks as
> options, and then include a few words on how to select a project to
> contribute to, how to approach them, etc.
Sure. In most cases, people will contribute to projects they are
actively using, or are interested in, so "selection" usually happens
quite naturally.
> I also think it'd be a good idea to mention a few projects that have schemes
> specifically aimed at recruiting relatively clueless users keen on
> contributing. The KDE Quality Team project (http://quality.kde.org/) does
> this, for example, and has some more expansive guides, especially in areas
> you don't have space to explain well (e.g. documentation, user interface,
> communication and promotion).
I'll take a look. It sounds good.
> And being an overtly and overly political type, I'd include a note about
> working with free software-friendly organisations to protect free software
> against legislative and technological threats :-)
I'll add something appropriate. It's not a political document itself,
though.
Thanks for your comments. I'll try to attend to them sometime this
week.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.