[Erc-discuss] Re: Generalizing erc-track?

[Michael Olson]

Jorgen Schaefer <address@hidden> writes:

> Depends. I do think it's not too hard to write a generalized
> buffer-tracking.el, though. The code in Lui could be rather easily
> factored out, and then it would be a matter of different clients
> (Circe, ERC, rcirc) to switch to the new library.
>
> This would not only be useful for the described case, but also for
> other applications that might want to use tracking.
>
> Would the ERC people be interested in such a change? I could be
> persuaded to try to provide such a library.

That could be worthwhile, as long as it implements the functionality
we need (and if it doesn't, it should be easy to add, with hooks
a-plenty).

-- 
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/
Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net
  /` |\ | | | IRC: freenode.net/mwolson: #emacs, #hcoop, #muse, #PurdueLUG
 |_] | \| |_| Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC

pgpjOd96hQMcq.pgp
Description: PGP signature