[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation process
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor |
Date: |
Wed, 19 May 2021 15:44:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Denis Maier <denismaier@mailbox.org> writes:
> \cite is the most basic cite command:
>
> In a author-year style:
> \cite => Doe 2020
> \textcite => Doe (2020)
> \parencite => (Doe 2020)
> \autocite => \parencite
>
> In note-based styles (e.g verbose):
>
> \cite => Doe, Title
> \footcite => [fn:: Doe, Title]
> \parencite => (Doe, Title)
> \autocite => \footcite
>
>>
>>> Also, footcite should be there.
>> Footcite is already there under the "note"/"fn" style.
>
> Good! (I was just a bit confused because biblatex has \footcite and
> \notecite.
Here is the summary:
| Style | Variant | Command |
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
| author | caps | Citeauthor* |
| author | full | citeauthor |
| author | caps-full | Citeauthor |
| author | | citeauthor |
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
| locators | bare | notecite |
| locators | caps | Pnotecite |
| locators | bare-caps | Notecite |
| locators | | pnotecite |
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
| nocite | | nocite |
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
| note | bare | footcitetext |
| note | | footcite |
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
| smart | caps | Smartcite |
| smart | | smartcite |
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
| super | | supercite |
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
| text | caps | Textcite |
| text | | textcite |
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
| title | full | citetitle* |
| title | | citetitle |
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
| year | full | citeyear* |
| year | | citeyear |
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
| (default) | caps | Autocite |
| (default) | | autocite |
"bare" variant means "without parenthesis", I think.
One problem is there is no "\cite", or "\parencite". I though they would
make a good fit for the default style, "\cite" being the "bare" variant
of "\parencite", and "\autocite" could be moved to a "auto" style. I'm
not sure where to put \cite, then.
Suggestions to change the table above are welcome.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/18
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/18
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/19
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/19
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/19
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/19
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/19
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/19
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/19
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/20