|
From: | Denis Maier |
Subject: | Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor |
Date: | Wed, 19 May 2021 12:03:21 +0200 |
Am 18.05.2021 um 17:13 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
Hello, In a rebased "wip-cite-new" branch, I made an modest attempt to write a `biblatex' citation processor, in the file "oc-biblatex.el
As Bruces has already written, this doesn't look modest at all. [...]
- author(a), including caps(c), full(f) and caps-full(f) variants, - locators(l), including bare(b), caps(c) bare-caps(bc) variants, - nocite(n), - note(fn), including bare(b) variant, - smart(sm), including caps(c) variant, - super(s), - text(t), including caps(c) variant, - title(ti), including full(f) variant, - year(y), including full(f) variant, - default style, including caps(c) variant.
Is there a way to get a simple \cite? Also, footcite should be there.
The default style creates "autocite" commands.
[...]
I think autocite is a reasonable default. Parencite would be a bad fit for the verbose styles. And in author-year styles autocite is equivalent to parencite anyway.I don't use biblatex, but I'm not convinced by the default autocite command. Wouldn't parencite be more predictable? Also, adding #+cite_export biblatex ... autoto trigger autocite by default seems easy enough.
Denis
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |