[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-mode markup vs rst for general content
From: |
Saša Janiška |
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-mode markup vs rst for general content |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Mar 2017 23:03:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
John Kitchin <address@hidden> writes:
> Could you be more specific about what kind of richness you are looking
> for?
In a general sense…iow, it’s a fact that rst markup is richer than
e.g. Markdown. Probably, Asciidoc(tor) also provides more semantic
richness and make it suitable markup for longer docs/books, so I wonder
where one can put org-mode’s markup on this scale?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
You have a right to perform your prescribed duty, but you
are not entitled to the fruits of action. Never consider
yourself the cause of the results of your activities,
and never be attached to not doing your duty.
- [O] org-mode markup vs rst for general content, Saša Janiška, 2017/03/09
- Re: [O] org-mode markup vs rst for general content, Uwe Brauer, 2017/03/10
- Re: [O] org-mode markup vs rst for general content, John Kitchin, 2017/03/10
- Re: [O] org-mode markup vs rst for general content, Uwe Brauer, 2017/03/10
- Re: [O] org-mode markup vs rst for general content, Uwe Brauer, 2017/03/10
- Re: [O] org-mode markup vs rst for general content, John Kitchin, 2017/03/10
- Re: [O] org-mode markup vs rst for general content, Uwe Brauer, 2017/03/10