[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org
|
From: |
William Denton |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org |
|
Date: |
Mon, 18 May 2015 09:07:17 -0400 (EDT) |
|
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) |
On 18 May 2015, Brett Witty wrote:
While there can be a bit of a culture shock getting used to org's "do the
useful thing" as opposed to "do the literal thing", I think it's an advantage
of the system, not a disadvantage. Headers are sacred in org-mode, so breaking
headers with RET seems suboptimal when there's vastly more things you'd care
about.
I'm on this side too. I like the current behaviour.
Bill
--
William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/
- Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, (continued)
- Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, Jarmo Hurri, 2015/05/17
- Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, Brett Witty, 2015/05/18
- Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, Rainer M Krug, 2015/05/18
- Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, Rasmus, 2015/05/18
- Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, Rainer M Krug, 2015/05/18
- Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org,
William Denton <=
- Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, Suvayu Ali, 2015/05/18
- Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, Rasmus, 2015/05/18
- Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, Suvayu Ali, 2015/05/19
Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, Rasmus, 2015/05/20
Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, Titus von der Malsburg, 2015/05/15