Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org

[Rasmus]

Rainer M Krug <address@hidden> writes:

> OK - this makes sense. But instead of jumping to the next line, a
> splitting of the header into two would make more sense, keeping the
> correct syntax.

That is literally what my patch does IF you are in region four (more or
less) of org-complex-heading-regexp.

> Jumping to the next line is actually counter intuitive, as this is pure
> movement.

It's what it does in tables (most of the time).  What would be better?

—Rasmus

-- 
However beautiful the theory, you should occasionally look at the evidence